![]() ![]() Likewise, 95% of Affinity Photo's editing operations are non-destructive. export to same folder as source file, using the exact same file name). It's totally non-destructive with raw files, and with TIFF and JPEG source files, it's non-destructive unless you export over it (i.e. Now to be fair, Affinity Photo is not a destructive editor. Affinity Photo does not have a DAM (although it doesn't sound like you really need a DAM), and its raw conversion and printing capabilities are quite basic and limited, compared to Lightroom's. If so, it is a deal breaker and unfortunate because it seems a nice package.Īlthough I've used Affinity Photo for several years, like it, and think it's a good value, I agree with the previous responses that Affinity Photo is not at all a reasonable replacement for Lightroom. It looks like the original RAW file is not preserved. My research seems to indicate that it is a destructive editor that creates a very large (3 to 7X) file for every edited RAW file even if it is just a crop plus some LR style image tweaking. Affinity seems to give me the RAW processing of LR plus most of PhotoShop in one application, but …. Time moves on, I’m getting a new Mac and looking around to see if I could / should dump Adobe. Less than 3% of the files get simple additional text (and other processing not available in LR) using Elements creating a large PSD file. I do use some simple ratings and labels in Bridge.) ![]() (This is a simple LR setting that lets me keep my original file structure which (for me) is easier to search, save and backup while only adding a few kilo bytes of storage compared to the LR library which I regularly completely purge. Process every file in LR, storing the data in the XMP sidecar file in the original location with the original RAW file Store / organize RAW files in a simple year- month file structure. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |